HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc SC7731E

The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc SC7731E are two processors with differing specifications and capabilities. Let's compare their specifications to gain a better understanding of their differences.

Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, this processor boasts an architecture consisting of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it is capable of handling more tasks simultaneously. The instruction set for this processor is ARMv8-A, which enables support for newer software and technologies. With a lithography of 16 nm, it is manufactured with a more advanced process, resulting in increased efficiency. The Kirin 950 also packs in 2000 million transistors, indicating its ability to process complex instructions. Furthermore, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watt, which means it consumes less power while delivering high performance.

On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E processor has a different set of specifications. It features a 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 architecture, offering a lower clock speed compared to the Kirin 950. With 4 cores, it may not handle multitasking as efficiently as the Kirin 950, but it can still provide decent performance for basic tasks. The instruction set of this processor is ARMv7-A, not as advanced as the ARMv8-A found in the Kirin 950. Additionally, the lithography for the SC7731E is 28 nm, which is a less efficient manufacturing process compared to the 16 nm of the Kirin 950. The TDP for this processor is 7 Watt, meaning it consumes slightly more power than the Kirin 950.

In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of processing power. It has a higher clock speed, more advanced architecture, lower lithography, and a lower TDP. Therefore, the Kirin 950 is capable of handling more complex tasks efficiently and consuming less power compared to the SC7731E. However, if the requirements are basic computing tasks, the Unisoc SC7731E can still deliver satisfactory performance. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and budget of the user.

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7
Number of cores 8 4
Instruction Set ARMv8-A ARMv7-A
Lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Number of transistors 2000 million
TDP 5 Watt 7 Watt

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 4 GB up to 1 GB
Memory type LPDDR4 LPDDR3
Memory frequency 1333 MHz 533 MHz
Memory-bus 2x32 bit


Storage specification UFS 2.0 eMMC 5.1


GPU name Mali-T880 MP4 Mali-T820 MP1
GPU Architecture Midgard Midgard
GPU frequency 900 MHz 600 MHz
Execution units 4 1
Shaders 64 4
DirectX 11.2 11
OpenCL API 1.2 1.2
OpenGL API ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.0 1.0

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 1440x720
Max camera resolution 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP 1x 8MP
Max Video Capture FullHD@60fps HD@30fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
H.264 (AVC)


4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 0.05 Gbps
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) 4 (802.11n)
Bluetooth 4.2 4.2
Satellite navigation BeiDou

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2015 November 2018 Quarter 2
Partnumber Hi3650
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Flagship Low-end

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Kirin 950

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Kirin 950

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Kirin 950