HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two processors that cater to different needs and specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 950 has 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 810 features 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, but the Dimensity 810 offers a higher clock speed for its primary cores.
Looking at the instruction set, the Kirin 950 supports ARMv8-A, while the Dimensity 810 supports ARMv8.2-A. This suggests that the Dimensity 810 may have better compatibility with newer software and technologies.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 950 has a 16 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 810 boasts a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and improved performance.
As for the number of transistors, the Kirin 950 has 2000 million transistors, while the Dimensity 810 has a significantly higher count of 12000 million transistors. This implies that the Dimensity 810 may have a more complex and dense architecture, potentially offering better performance and efficiency.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 950 has a TDP of 5 Watts, whereas the Dimensity 810 has a slightly higher TDP of 8 Watts. It is worth noting that the Dimensity 810 also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enables advanced AI capabilities.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 surpasses the HiSilicon Kirin 950 in certain aspects, such as lithography and number of transistors. However, the Kirin 950 still holds its ground with its impressive CPU architecture. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or device.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 950 has 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 810 features 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, but the Dimensity 810 offers a higher clock speed for its primary cores.
Looking at the instruction set, the Kirin 950 supports ARMv8-A, while the Dimensity 810 supports ARMv8.2-A. This suggests that the Dimensity 810 may have better compatibility with newer software and technologies.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 950 has a 16 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 810 boasts a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and improved performance.
As for the number of transistors, the Kirin 950 has 2000 million transistors, while the Dimensity 810 has a significantly higher count of 12000 million transistors. This implies that the Dimensity 810 may have a more complex and dense architecture, potentially offering better performance and efficiency.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 950 has a TDP of 5 Watts, whereas the Dimensity 810 has a slightly higher TDP of 8 Watts. It is worth noting that the Dimensity 810 also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enables advanced AI capabilities.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 surpasses the HiSilicon Kirin 950 in certain aspects, such as lithography and number of transistors. However, the Kirin 950 still holds its ground with its impressive CPU architecture. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or device.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | 12000 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 8 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 2K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
5
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
6
MediaTek Helio P90 vs MediaTek Helio G37
7
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
9
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Helio P70
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Helio G70