HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors that are commonly used in smartphones and other mobile devices. While both processors have their own unique features and specifications, there are some key differences between them.
One of the main differences between the two processors is their architecture. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 features a quad-core, 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 architecture along with a quad-core, 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 architecture. This combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores allows for efficient multitasking and improved power management. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U comes with a dual-core, 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 architecture and a hexa-core, 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture. While the HiSilicon Kirin 950 offers a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U's use of a more advanced architecture may provide better overall performance.
Another notable difference between the two processors is their lithography. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 is built on a 16 nm process, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 800U is built on a 7 nm process. A smaller lithography generally allows for improved power efficiency and better performance due to the closer proximity of transistors, resulting in shorter and faster connections. Therefore, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U may offer a more efficient and powerful performance compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 950.
Additionally, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized component is designed to handle artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, enabling the processor to perform complex calculations quickly and efficiently. The HiSilicon Kirin 950, on the other hand, does not include a specifically dedicated NPU.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U are both capable processors, but they differ in their architecture, lithography, and additional features. While the HiSilicon Kirin 950 excels in terms of clock speed and power management, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U offers a more advanced architecture and the inclusion of an NPU. Therefore, the choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.
One of the main differences between the two processors is their architecture. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 features a quad-core, 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 architecture along with a quad-core, 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 architecture. This combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores allows for efficient multitasking and improved power management. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U comes with a dual-core, 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 architecture and a hexa-core, 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture. While the HiSilicon Kirin 950 offers a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U's use of a more advanced architecture may provide better overall performance.
Another notable difference between the two processors is their lithography. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 is built on a 16 nm process, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 800U is built on a 7 nm process. A smaller lithography generally allows for improved power efficiency and better performance due to the closer proximity of transistors, resulting in shorter and faster connections. Therefore, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U may offer a more efficient and powerful performance compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 950.
Additionally, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized component is designed to handle artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, enabling the processor to perform complex calculations quickly and efficiently. The HiSilicon Kirin 950, on the other hand, does not include a specifically dedicated NPU.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U are both capable processors, but they differ in their architecture, lithography, and additional features. While the HiSilicon Kirin 950 excels in terms of clock speed and power management, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U offers a more advanced architecture and the inclusion of an NPU. Therefore, the choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 3 |
Shaders | 64 | 48 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2020 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
3
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
6
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
9
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Google Tensor G2
10
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G