HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors with distinctive specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it boasts an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balance between power and efficiency. Built on a 16 nm lithography, it contains a significant number of transistors, standing at 2000 million. The Kirin 950 operates with a TDP of 5 Watts, which indicates its power consumption level.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 features an architecture with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 4 cores, it is designed to provide a different performance profile compared to the Kirin 950. The Dimensity 800 operates on a more advanced 7 nm lithography, which contributes to its enhanced energy efficiency. Furthermore, this processor has a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating a higher power consumption compared to the Kirin 950. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 offers neural processing capabilities with an NPU, allowing for improved AI performance.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors differ in several key specifications. The Kirin 950 has more cores and a different combination of Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Dimensity 800 features a smaller number of cores but utilizes Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. The Kirin 950 operates on a 16 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 800 operates on a more advanced 7 nm lithography. Moreover, the Dimensity 800 offers an NPU for enhanced AI capabilities. These differences in specifications ultimately result in distinct performance profiles for each processor.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it boasts an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balance between power and efficiency. Built on a 16 nm lithography, it contains a significant number of transistors, standing at 2000 million. The Kirin 950 operates with a TDP of 5 Watts, which indicates its power consumption level.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 features an architecture with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 4 cores, it is designed to provide a different performance profile compared to the Kirin 950. The Dimensity 800 operates on a more advanced 7 nm lithography, which contributes to its enhanced energy efficiency. Furthermore, this processor has a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating a higher power consumption compared to the Kirin 950. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 offers neural processing capabilities with an NPU, allowing for improved AI performance.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors differ in several key specifications. The Kirin 950 has more cores and a different combination of Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Dimensity 800 features a smaller number of cores but utilizes Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. The Kirin 950 operates on a 16 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 800 operates on a more advanced 7 nm lithography. Moreover, the Dimensity 800 offers an NPU for enhanced AI capabilities. These differences in specifications ultimately result in distinct performance profiles for each processor.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 64 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2020 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | MT6873, MT6873V |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Google Tensor G1
2
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
4
Google Tensor G3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs MediaTek Helio G90
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G35
9
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
10
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Apple A14 Bionic