HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Kirin 980 processors are both powerful and efficient options for mobile devices, but they have notable differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features a total of eight cores divided into two clusters. The first cluster consists of four Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, while the second cluster has four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This architecture offers a balance between performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 950 is built on a 16 nm lithography process and has 2000 million transistors. The processor's total power consumption, or thermal design power (TDP), is rated at 5 Watts. Additionally, the Kirin 950 uses the ARMv8-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 brings some improvements over its predecessor. It also boasts eight cores with a similar architecture division. The processor includes two powerful Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, two additional Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 1.92 GHz, and four energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. This mix of cores aims to balance performance and power consumption in different scenarios. The Kirin 980 is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, allowing for greater transistor density. It incorporates a staggering 6900 million transistors, significantly more than the Kirin 950. The processor's TDP is slightly higher at 6 Watts. Furthermore, the Kirin 980 also includes the HiSilicon Dual NPU, which enhances artificial intelligence processing capabilities.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 comes with notable improvements compared to the Kirin 950. With a more advanced manufacturing process, increased transistor count, and dual neural processing unit (NPU), it offers increased performance and greater efficiency. The Kirin 980's upgraded architecture and AI capabilities make it a desirable choice for users seeking high-end performance in their mobile devices.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features a total of eight cores divided into two clusters. The first cluster consists of four Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, while the second cluster has four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This architecture offers a balance between performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 950 is built on a 16 nm lithography process and has 2000 million transistors. The processor's total power consumption, or thermal design power (TDP), is rated at 5 Watts. Additionally, the Kirin 950 uses the ARMv8-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 brings some improvements over its predecessor. It also boasts eight cores with a similar architecture division. The processor includes two powerful Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, two additional Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 1.92 GHz, and four energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. This mix of cores aims to balance performance and power consumption in different scenarios. The Kirin 980 is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, allowing for greater transistor density. It incorporates a staggering 6900 million transistors, significantly more than the Kirin 950. The processor's TDP is slightly higher at 6 Watts. Furthermore, the Kirin 980 also includes the HiSilicon Dual NPU, which enhances artificial intelligence processing capabilities.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 comes with notable improvements compared to the Kirin 950. With a more advanced manufacturing process, increased transistor count, and dual neural processing unit (NPU), it offers increased performance and greater efficiency. The Kirin 980's upgraded architecture and AI capabilities make it a desirable choice for users seeking high-end performance in their mobile devices.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | 6900 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 720 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 10 |
Shaders | 64 | 160 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.4 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2018 Quarter 4 |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs MediaTek Helio G25
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Unisoc SC9863A
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
7
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
9
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Google Tensor G2
10
Apple A11 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T710