HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G

VS
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G are two powerful processors with their own sets of specifications. Let's compare them based on their CPU cores and architecture, instruction set, lithography, number of transistors, power consumption, and neural processing capabilities.

Starting with the Kirin 950, it features an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz - Cortex-A72 and 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex-A53. It has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8-A instruction set. The lithography of this processor is 16 nm, and it consists of 2000 million transistors. In terms of power consumption, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts.

On the other hand, the Kirin 9000E 5G showcases a different architecture. It has 1x 3.13 GHz - Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz - Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz - Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 950, it also houses 8 cores but operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The lithography has significantly improved to 5 nm, and the number of transistors has increased to 15300 million. The power consumption for this processor stands at 6 Watts. Additionally, it boasts neural processing capabilities with Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.

In summary, the Kirin 950 offers a balanced CPU core composition with a lower lithography, fewer transistors, and a comparatively lower power consumption. On the other hand, the Kirin 9000E 5G showcases a more advanced CPU architecture, higher lithography, significantly more transistors, and slightly higher power consumption. Furthermore, it incorporates neural processing capabilities.

These specifications suggest that the Kirin 9000E 5G is a more advanced processor in terms of performance and efficiency. However, the specific usage and requirements of the processor should be considered when choosing between the two.

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
Number of cores 8 8
Instruction Set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
Lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Number of transistors 2000 million 15300 million
TDP 5 Watt 6 Watt
Neural Processing Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 4 GB up to 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR4 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 1333 MHz 2750 MHz
Memory-bus 2x32 bit 4x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification UFS 2.0 UFS 3.1

Graphics

GPU name Mali-T880 MP4 Mali-G78 MP22
GPU Architecture Midgard Valhall
GPU frequency 900 MHz 760 MHz
Execution units 4 22
Shaders 64 352
DirectX 11.2 12
OpenCL API 1.2 2.1
OpenGL API ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.0 1.2

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 3840x2160
Max camera resolution 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP
Max Video Capture FullHD@60fps 4K@60fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP8
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP8
VP9

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 0.3 Gbps 4.6 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 0.05 Gbps 2.5 Gbps
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth 4.2 5.2
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
NavIC

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2015 November 2020 October
Partnumber Hi3650
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Flagship Flagship

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Kirin 950
135741
Kirin 9000E 5G
737022

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
Kirin 950
341
Kirin 9000E 5G
1059

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
Kirin 950
1294
Kirin 9000E 5G
3702