HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Unisoc Tiger T618

When comparing the specifications of the HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc Tiger T618 processors, several differences become apparent.

Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 features 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also totaling 8 cores. Therefore, both processors have the same number of cores, but the architecture differs.

In terms of instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 employs the ARMv8-A, while the Unisoc Tiger T618 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A. This indicates that the latter processor has a more advanced instruction set architecture compared to the former.

Another notable difference lies in the lithography process. The HiSilicon Kirin 935 operates on a 28 nm process, while the Unisoc Tiger T618 uses a more advanced 12 nm lithography process. A smaller lithography process generally results in improved performance and energy efficiency.

In terms of power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watts, whereas the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This means that the HiSilicon processor is designed to be more power-efficient than the Unisoc processor.

Additionally, the Unisoc Tiger T618 stands out with the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized unit enables better artificial intelligence (AI) processing, potentially enhancing various applications that rely on AI technologies.

In summary, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc Tiger T618 processors have 8 cores, the Unisoc processor features a more advanced instruction set architecture and a smaller lithography process. However, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 processor boasts lower power consumption. The Unisoc Tiger T618 processor also includes an NPU, which can provide better AI processing capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user or device manufacturer.