HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are both powerful processors with different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 935, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This means it is an octa-core processor with a total of eight cores. The instruction set it uses is ARMv8-A and it has a lithography of 28 nm. The number of transistors in this processor is 1000 million, which contributes to its high performance. Additionally, the TDP of the Kirin 935 is 7 Watts, which indicates its power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G offers a different architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 935, this processor is also an octa-core with eight cores in total. The instruction set used by the Tanggula T770 5G is ARMv8.2-A, which indicates its advanced capabilities. One notable feature of this processor is its lithography of 6 nm, which is more advanced than the Kirin 935 and generally results in improved performance. The Tanggula T770 5G also has a TDP of 5 Watts, indicating its lower power consumption. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In summary, while both processors have eight cores and utilize ARMv8 instruction sets, they differ in terms of their CPU architecture, lithography, TDP, and additional features. The HiSilicon Kirin 935 operates on a 28 nm lithography, consumes 7 Watts, and does not feature an NPU. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G utilizes a more advanced 6 nm lithography, consumes 5 Watts, and includes an NPU. These differences in specifications can impact the overall performance and efficiency of the processors in various applications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 935, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This means it is an octa-core processor with a total of eight cores. The instruction set it uses is ARMv8-A and it has a lithography of 28 nm. The number of transistors in this processor is 1000 million, which contributes to its high performance. Additionally, the TDP of the Kirin 935 is 7 Watts, which indicates its power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G offers a different architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 935, this processor is also an octa-core with eight cores in total. The instruction set used by the Tanggula T770 5G is ARMv8.2-A, which indicates its advanced capabilities. One notable feature of this processor is its lithography of 6 nm, which is more advanced than the Kirin 935 and generally results in improved performance. The Tanggula T770 5G also has a TDP of 5 Watts, indicating its lower power consumption. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In summary, while both processors have eight cores and utilize ARMv8 instruction sets, they differ in terms of their CPU architecture, lithography, TDP, and additional features. The HiSilicon Kirin 935 operates on a 28 nm lithography, consumes 7 Watts, and does not feature an NPU. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G utilizes a more advanced 6 nm lithography, consumes 5 Watts, and includes an NPU. These differences in specifications can impact the overall performance and efficiency of the processors in various applications.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 7 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 32 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2160x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | Hi3635 | T770, Tiger T7520 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
3
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Helio G80
5
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
7
Samsung Exynos 980 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Helio G35
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Helio P95
10
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Samsung Exynos 9820