HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors that cater to different needs due to their contrasting specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 935, it consists of 8 cores with a unique architecture. It includes 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and another set of 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, resulting in a total of 8 cores. The instruction set of this processor is ARMv8-A, allowing for efficient execution of commands. With a lithography of 28 nm and 1000 million transistors, this processor strikes a balance between performance and power consumption. It has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watts, ensuring optimal energy usage.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G boasts superior CPU cores and architecture. It also has a total of 8 cores, divided into 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination allows for efficient multitasking and processing of complex tasks. The instruction set of this processor is ARMv8.2-A, which indicates support for the latest ARM architecture enhancements. With a lithography of 12 nm, the Tanggula T740 delivers improved efficiency compared to the Kirin 935. Furthermore, it features a dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enabling it to excel in artificial intelligence-related tasks.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 935 boasts a decent combination of cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G outshines it in various aspects. The Tanggula T740's superior CPU architecture, instruction set, and lithography make it a more advanced and energy-efficient option. Additionally, the inclusion of a dual NPU allows for exceptional performance in AI tasks. However, the choice between the two processors ultimately depends on specific requirements and usage scenarios.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 935, it consists of 8 cores with a unique architecture. It includes 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and another set of 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, resulting in a total of 8 cores. The instruction set of this processor is ARMv8-A, allowing for efficient execution of commands. With a lithography of 28 nm and 1000 million transistors, this processor strikes a balance between performance and power consumption. It has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watts, ensuring optimal energy usage.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G boasts superior CPU cores and architecture. It also has a total of 8 cores, divided into 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination allows for efficient multitasking and processing of complex tasks. The instruction set of this processor is ARMv8.2-A, which indicates support for the latest ARM architecture enhancements. With a lithography of 12 nm, the Tanggula T740 delivers improved efficiency compared to the Kirin 935. Furthermore, it features a dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enabling it to excel in artificial intelligence-related tasks.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 935 boasts a decent combination of cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G outshines it in various aspects. The Tanggula T740's superior CPU architecture, instruction set, and lithography make it a more advanced and energy-efficient option. Additionally, the inclusion of a dual NPU allows for exceptional performance in AI tasks. However, the choice between the two processors ultimately depends on specific requirements and usage scenarios.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 7 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 11 | |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2960x1440@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi3635 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
2
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
4
Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
5
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
7
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
8
MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
9
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
10
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Helio P90