HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the Unisoc SC7731E are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 935, it features an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a powerful performance for multitasking and running demanding applications. The instruction set used is ARMv8-A, which ensures compatibility with the latest software and technologies. The lithography of 28 nm indicates its manufacturing process, which may not be as efficient as newer processors with smaller lithography sizes. However, it still delivers decent performance. The number of transistors is 1000 million, suggesting a good level of hardware integration. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 7 Watts, indicating moderate power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E has an architecture of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. With only 4 cores, this processor may not provide as much processing power as the Kirin 935. The instruction set used is ARMv7-A, which is slightly older than the Kirin 935's ARMv8-A. The lithography size is 28 nm, similar to the Kirin 935, suggesting a comparable manufacturing process. The TDP is also 7 Watts, indicating similar power consumption.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 offers a more advanced architecture and twice as many cores compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. It also utilizes the newer ARMv8-A instruction set for better software compatibility. However, both processors share the same lithography size and TDP, suggesting they may have similar power consumption levels. Ultimately, the Kirin 935 is likely to deliver better performance and multitasking capabilities compared to the SC7731E.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 935, it features an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a powerful performance for multitasking and running demanding applications. The instruction set used is ARMv8-A, which ensures compatibility with the latest software and technologies. The lithography of 28 nm indicates its manufacturing process, which may not be as efficient as newer processors with smaller lithography sizes. However, it still delivers decent performance. The number of transistors is 1000 million, suggesting a good level of hardware integration. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 7 Watts, indicating moderate power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E has an architecture of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. With only 4 cores, this processor may not provide as much processing power as the Kirin 935. The instruction set used is ARMv7-A, which is slightly older than the Kirin 935's ARMv8-A. The lithography size is 28 nm, similar to the Kirin 935, suggesting a comparable manufacturing process. The TDP is also 7 Watts, indicating similar power consumption.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 offers a more advanced architecture and twice as many cores compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. It also utilizes the newer ARMv8-A instruction set for better software compatibility. However, both processors share the same lithography size and TDP, suggesting they may have similar power consumption levels. Ultimately, the Kirin 935 is likely to deliver better performance and multitasking capabilities compared to the SC7731E.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 7 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3635 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
3
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Apple A16 Bionic
4
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Helio G88
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Unisoc SC9863A
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
7
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
9
MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
10
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632