HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 935 and the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G are both powerful processors, but they have significant differences in their specifications.
The HiSilicon Kirin 935 features an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53, offering a total of 8 cores. It has a 28 nm lithography and houses around 1000 million transistors. With a TDP of 7 watts, this processor delivers a decent performance within its power limitations.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G surpasses its predecessor with more advanced features. It boasts an architecture of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55, also offering a total of 8 cores. With an improved 5 nm lithography, it contains a whopping 15300 million transistors, indicating a significant boost in performance compared to the Kirin 935. Despite the enhanced capabilities, it manages to operate at a TDP of 6 watts.
One notable addition to the Kirin 9000 5G is its Neural Processing capability, which includes Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x). This addition, along with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, enables the processor to handle complex AI tasks more effectively, further enhancing the overall performance.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G surpasses the Kirin 935 in most aspects. It offers a more advanced architecture, operates on a smaller lithography, and contains significantly more transistors. Additionally, the inclusion of Neural Processing capability allows for improved AI performance. However, both processors have relatively low TDP values, indicating efficiency in power consumption.
The HiSilicon Kirin 935 features an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53, offering a total of 8 cores. It has a 28 nm lithography and houses around 1000 million transistors. With a TDP of 7 watts, this processor delivers a decent performance within its power limitations.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G surpasses its predecessor with more advanced features. It boasts an architecture of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55, also offering a total of 8 cores. With an improved 5 nm lithography, it contains a whopping 15300 million transistors, indicating a significant boost in performance compared to the Kirin 935. Despite the enhanced capabilities, it manages to operate at a TDP of 6 watts.
One notable addition to the Kirin 9000 5G is its Neural Processing capability, which includes Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x). This addition, along with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, enables the processor to handle complex AI tasks more effectively, further enhancing the overall performance.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G surpasses the Kirin 935 in most aspects. It offers a more advanced architecture, operates on a smaller lithography, and contains significantly more transistors. Additionally, the inclusion of Neural Processing capability allows for improved AI performance. However, both processors have relatively low TDP values, indicating efficiency in power consumption.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | 1000 million | 15300 million |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G78 MP24 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 760 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 24 |
| Shaders | 64 | 384 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 3840x2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2020 October |
| Partnumber | Hi3635 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
4
Apple A18 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
5
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
7
Samsung Exynos 7885 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
8
MediaTek Helio G200 vs Apple M5 (iPad)
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
10
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Unisoc T9100