HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
When comparing the specifications of the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the Unisoc Tiger T610 processors, several key differences can be observed.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 features an architecture of 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 consists of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores in total, providing ample processing power.
When it comes to the instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This slight variation in instruction sets may result in differences in performance and compatibility with certain software and applications.
Another notable difference can be seen in the lithography of the processors. The HiSilicon Kirin 930 has a lithography of 28 nm, whereas the Unisoc Tiger T610 features a more advanced 12 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally allows for higher efficiency and improved performance.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the HiSilicon Kirin 930 has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP indicates that the processor consumes less power and produces less heat, which can contribute to longer battery life and better overall energy efficiency.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the Unisoc Tiger T610 processors differ in various aspects. While the HiSilicon Kirin 930 has a higher number of CPU cores and a lower TDP, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features a more advanced lithography and a slightly different instruction set. Ultimately, the choice between these processors may depend on individual needs and preferences, such as the desired level of performance, power consumption, and compatibility with specific software and applications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 features an architecture of 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 consists of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores in total, providing ample processing power.
When it comes to the instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This slight variation in instruction sets may result in differences in performance and compatibility with certain software and applications.
Another notable difference can be seen in the lithography of the processors. The HiSilicon Kirin 930 has a lithography of 28 nm, whereas the Unisoc Tiger T610 features a more advanced 12 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally allows for higher efficiency and improved performance.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the HiSilicon Kirin 930 has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP indicates that the processor consumes less power and produces less heat, which can contribute to longer battery life and better overall energy efficiency.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the Unisoc Tiger T610 processors differ in various aspects. While the HiSilicon Kirin 930 has a higher number of CPU cores and a lower TDP, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features a more advanced lithography and a slightly different instruction set. Ultimately, the choice between these processors may depend on individual needs and preferences, such as the desired level of performance, power consumption, and compatibility with specific software and applications.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| Shaders | 64 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2019 June |
| Partnumber | Hi3630 | T610 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
2
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
4
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
7
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Apple A18 Pro
8
Samsung Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 vs MediaTek Helio G91
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek MT6739