HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the Unisoc Tiger T606 are two processors that differ in their specifications.
The Kirin 930 is built on a 28 nm lithography, while the Tiger T606 is built on a more advanced 12 nm process. This means that the Tiger T606 is more power-efficient, as it requires a lower thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts compared to the Kirin 930’s TDP of 5 Watts.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 930 has 8 cores divided into two sets. It has 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz and another 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. On the other hand, the Tiger T606 also has 8 cores, but with a different arrangement. It has 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz as well.
The Kirin 930 utilizes an ARMv8-A instruction set, whereas the Tiger T606 uses the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This implies that the Tiger T606 might be more optimized for newer software and applications.
When it comes to the number of transistors, the Kirin 930 boasts 1000 million transistors, but there is no information available about the transistors in the Tiger T606.
In summary, the Tiger T606 has a more advanced manufacturing process, higher TDP, and a different core arrangement compared to the Kirin 930. The Tiger T606 also supports a newer instruction set. However, more information is needed about the Tiger T606's number of transistors to make a complete comparison.
The Kirin 930 is built on a 28 nm lithography, while the Tiger T606 is built on a more advanced 12 nm process. This means that the Tiger T606 is more power-efficient, as it requires a lower thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts compared to the Kirin 930’s TDP of 5 Watts.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 930 has 8 cores divided into two sets. It has 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz and another 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. On the other hand, the Tiger T606 also has 8 cores, but with a different arrangement. It has 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz as well.
The Kirin 930 utilizes an ARMv8-A instruction set, whereas the Tiger T606 uses the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This implies that the Tiger T606 might be more optimized for newer software and applications.
When it comes to the number of transistors, the Kirin 930 boasts 1000 million transistors, but there is no information available about the transistors in the Tiger T606.
In summary, the Tiger T606 has a more advanced manufacturing process, higher TDP, and a different core arrangement compared to the Kirin 930. The Tiger T606 also supports a newer instruction set. However, more information is needed about the Tiger T606's number of transistors to make a complete comparison.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
2
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
4
Unisoc SC7731E vs Apple A14 Bionic
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
6
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
7
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Helio G70
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
9
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930