HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and Unisoc SC7731E are two processors that possess different specifications, making them suitable for different types of devices.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features 8 cores that are divided into two sections: 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53. This processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. With a total number of transistors of 1000 million, it delivers a powerful performance. Furthermore, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, indicating its low power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E comes with 4 cores, all running at a speed of 1.3 GHz using the Cortex-A7 architecture. It uses the ARMv7-A instruction set and also has a lithography of 28 nm. With a TDP of 7 Watts, it is slightly less energy-efficient compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 930.
When it comes to performance, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 has an advantage due to its higher number of cores and faster clock speeds. It offers better multitasking capabilities and can handle demanding tasks more efficiently. Additionally, its ARMv8-A instruction set enables it to execute more complex instructions.
In terms of power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 once again outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E with its lower TDP. This is a crucial factor for devices that prioritize battery life, such as smartphones and tablets.
However, it is important to note that the Unisoc SC7731E is still a capable processor suitable for entry-level devices. It may not have the same level of performance as the HiSilicon Kirin 930, but it can handle basic tasks and applications effectively.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 930 excels in terms of performance and power efficiency, the Unisoc SC7731E is a suitable choice for budget-friendly devices. The choice between these processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements and budget of the device in question.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features 8 cores that are divided into two sections: 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53. This processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. With a total number of transistors of 1000 million, it delivers a powerful performance. Furthermore, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, indicating its low power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E comes with 4 cores, all running at a speed of 1.3 GHz using the Cortex-A7 architecture. It uses the ARMv7-A instruction set and also has a lithography of 28 nm. With a TDP of 7 Watts, it is slightly less energy-efficient compared to the HiSilicon Kirin 930.
When it comes to performance, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 has an advantage due to its higher number of cores and faster clock speeds. It offers better multitasking capabilities and can handle demanding tasks more efficiently. Additionally, its ARMv8-A instruction set enables it to execute more complex instructions.
In terms of power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 once again outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E with its lower TDP. This is a crucial factor for devices that prioritize battery life, such as smartphones and tablets.
However, it is important to note that the Unisoc SC7731E is still a capable processor suitable for entry-level devices. It may not have the same level of performance as the HiSilicon Kirin 930, but it can handle basic tasks and applications effectively.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 930 excels in terms of performance and power efficiency, the Unisoc SC7731E is a suitable choice for budget-friendly devices. The choice between these processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements and budget of the device in question.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Helio G96
2
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Samsung Exynos 850
3
MediaTek Helio G70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
5
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
6
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Apple A11 Bionic
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek Helio G35
9
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
10
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950