HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors with varying specifications. First, let's look at the HiSilicon Kirin 930. It features a total of 8 cores, including 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz and another 4 Cortex-A53 cores running at 1.5 GHz. This processor is built on a 28 nm lithography process and has a total of 1000 million transistors. Its instruction set is ARMv8-A, and it operates with a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processor comes with 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and an additional 4 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This processor is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, which is a significant improvement over the Kirin 930. The Dimensity 800 also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP of 10 Watts. A notable feature of the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Kirin 930 and Dimensity 800 differ in their configurations. The Kirin 930 has a higher number of cores with a lower maximum clock speed, while the Dimensity 800 has fewer cores but with a higher clock speed for both its A76 and A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 800 may offer better single-core performance, while the Kirin 930 may excel in multi-threaded tasks.
Furthermore, the use of a 7 nm lithography process in the Dimensity 800 indicates that it is more power-efficient compared to the Kirin 930's 28 nm process. However, it's important to note that the Dimensity 800 has a higher TDP, which implies that it might consume more power under heavy workloads.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors differ in various aspects. The Kirin 930 has more CPU cores but operates at lower clock speeds, while the Dimensity 800 has fewer cores but higher clock speeds. The Dimensity 800 also benefits from a more advanced 7 nm lithography process and features an NPU for improved AI performance. Ultimately, considerations such as workload type and power efficiency will play a crucial role in determining which processor is the better choice.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processor comes with 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and an additional 4 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This processor is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, which is a significant improvement over the Kirin 930. The Dimensity 800 also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP of 10 Watts. A notable feature of the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Kirin 930 and Dimensity 800 differ in their configurations. The Kirin 930 has a higher number of cores with a lower maximum clock speed, while the Dimensity 800 has fewer cores but with a higher clock speed for both its A76 and A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 800 may offer better single-core performance, while the Kirin 930 may excel in multi-threaded tasks.
Furthermore, the use of a 7 nm lithography process in the Dimensity 800 indicates that it is more power-efficient compared to the Kirin 930's 28 nm process. However, it's important to note that the Dimensity 800 has a higher TDP, which implies that it might consume more power under heavy workloads.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors differ in various aspects. The Kirin 930 has more CPU cores but operates at lower clock speeds, while the Dimensity 800 has fewer cores but higher clock speeds. The Dimensity 800 also benefits from a more advanced 7 nm lithography process and features an NPU for improved AI performance. Ultimately, considerations such as workload type and power efficiency will play a crucial role in determining which processor is the better choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 64 |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2020 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | MT6873, MT6873V |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
2
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Apple A11 Bionic
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Samsung Exynos 1330
4
Apple A10 Fusion vs Google Tensor G3
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
6
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Helio G25
7
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs MediaTek Helio P65
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Helio G37
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080