HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors with varying specifications. First, let's look at the HiSilicon Kirin 930. It features a total of 8 cores, including 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz and another 4 Cortex-A53 cores running at 1.5 GHz. This processor is built on a 28 nm lithography process and has a total of 1000 million transistors. Its instruction set is ARMv8-A, and it operates with a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processor comes with 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and an additional 4 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This processor is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, which is a significant improvement over the Kirin 930. The Dimensity 800 also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP of 10 Watts. A notable feature of the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Kirin 930 and Dimensity 800 differ in their configurations. The Kirin 930 has a higher number of cores with a lower maximum clock speed, while the Dimensity 800 has fewer cores but with a higher clock speed for both its A76 and A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 800 may offer better single-core performance, while the Kirin 930 may excel in multi-threaded tasks.
Furthermore, the use of a 7 nm lithography process in the Dimensity 800 indicates that it is more power-efficient compared to the Kirin 930's 28 nm process. However, it's important to note that the Dimensity 800 has a higher TDP, which implies that it might consume more power under heavy workloads.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors differ in various aspects. The Kirin 930 has more CPU cores but operates at lower clock speeds, while the Dimensity 800 has fewer cores but higher clock speeds. The Dimensity 800 also benefits from a more advanced 7 nm lithography process and features an NPU for improved AI performance. Ultimately, considerations such as workload type and power efficiency will play a crucial role in determining which processor is the better choice.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processor comes with 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and an additional 4 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This processor is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, which is a significant improvement over the Kirin 930. The Dimensity 800 also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP of 10 Watts. A notable feature of the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Kirin 930 and Dimensity 800 differ in their configurations. The Kirin 930 has a higher number of cores with a lower maximum clock speed, while the Dimensity 800 has fewer cores but with a higher clock speed for both its A76 and A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 800 may offer better single-core performance, while the Kirin 930 may excel in multi-threaded tasks.
Furthermore, the use of a 7 nm lithography process in the Dimensity 800 indicates that it is more power-efficient compared to the Kirin 930's 28 nm process. However, it's important to note that the Dimensity 800 has a higher TDP, which implies that it might consume more power under heavy workloads.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors differ in various aspects. The Kirin 930 has more CPU cores but operates at lower clock speeds, while the Dimensity 800 has fewer cores but higher clock speeds. The Dimensity 800 also benefits from a more advanced 7 nm lithography process and features an NPU for improved AI performance. Ultimately, considerations such as workload type and power efficiency will play a crucial role in determining which processor is the better choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 64 |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2020 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | MT6873, MT6873V |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P65 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
2
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 990
3
MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Helio G25
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Apple A11 Bionic
5
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
7
Apple A17 Pro vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
9
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690