HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
When comparing two processors, it is essential to consider their specifications, as these determine their performance capabilities. In this case, let's compare the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the MediaTek Dimensity 720.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features an architecture that includes four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz and another four Cortex-A53 cores running at 1.5 GHz. This octa-core processor operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. With 1,000 million transistors, it has the potential to handle complex tasks efficiently. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) for this processor is rated at 5 Watts.
On the other hand, we have the MediaTek Dimensity 720, which boasts a slightly different architecture. It consists of two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. With this heterogeneous octa-core configuration, it provides a diverse range of processing capabilities. The Dimensity 720 operates on the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set and boasts a smaller lithography of 7 nm, which often translates to improved power efficiency. Additionally, it has a TDP of 10 Watts and features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the MediaTek Dimensity 720 offer different specifications and features. While the Kirin 930 has a higher base clock speed for all its cores, the Dimensity 720 has a more advanced CPU architecture, including Cortex-A76 cores and an NPU. The Dimensity 720's use of a 7 nm lithography also indicates a potential advantage in power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities for a given device or application.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features an architecture that includes four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz and another four Cortex-A53 cores running at 1.5 GHz. This octa-core processor operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. With 1,000 million transistors, it has the potential to handle complex tasks efficiently. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) for this processor is rated at 5 Watts.
On the other hand, we have the MediaTek Dimensity 720, which boasts a slightly different architecture. It consists of two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. With this heterogeneous octa-core configuration, it provides a diverse range of processing capabilities. The Dimensity 720 operates on the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set and boasts a smaller lithography of 7 nm, which often translates to improved power efficiency. Additionally, it has a TDP of 10 Watts and features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the MediaTek Dimensity 720 offer different specifications and features. While the Kirin 930 has a higher base clock speed for all its cores, the Dimensity 720 has a more advanced CPU architecture, including Cortex-A76 cores and an NPU. The Dimensity 720's use of a 7 nm lithography also indicates a potential advantage in power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities for a given device or application.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 3 |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2520x1080@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
2
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
3
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Helio P90
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
6
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
7
Google Tensor G3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
10
Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888