HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and Kirin 955 processors are two powerful choices for mobile devices. Let's compare their specifications to better understand their capabilities.
Starting with the Kirin 930, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz and an additional 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm, indicating the size of its transistors. The number of transistors in the Kirin 930 is 1000 million, giving it a solid performance. Additionally, it has a thermal design power (TDP) rating of 5 Watts, indicating its power efficiency.
Moving on to the Kirin 955, its CPU architecture consists of 4 Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With an improved architecture using Cortex-A72 cores, this processor offers a higher level of performance compared to the Kirin 930. Similar to its predecessor, it also uses the ARMv8-A instruction set but boasts a smaller lithography of 16 nm. This reduced size allows for more transistors, resulting in a total of 2000 million transistors in the Kirin 955. The increased number of transistors enhances its capabilities and overall performance. Like the Kirin 930, the Kirin 955 has a TDP rating of 5 Watts, showcasing its power efficiency in spite of its higher performance.
In conclusion, while both the Kirin 930 and Kirin 955 processors offer excellent performance, the Kirin 955 outshines its predecessor in terms of architectural improvements, smaller lithography, and a higher number of transistors. These advancements allow the Kirin 955 to deliver enhanced power and performance without compromising on power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on specific device requirements and user preferences.
Starting with the Kirin 930, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2 GHz and an additional 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm, indicating the size of its transistors. The number of transistors in the Kirin 930 is 1000 million, giving it a solid performance. Additionally, it has a thermal design power (TDP) rating of 5 Watts, indicating its power efficiency.
Moving on to the Kirin 955, its CPU architecture consists of 4 Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With an improved architecture using Cortex-A72 cores, this processor offers a higher level of performance compared to the Kirin 930. Similar to its predecessor, it also uses the ARMv8-A instruction set but boasts a smaller lithography of 16 nm. This reduced size allows for more transistors, resulting in a total of 2000 million transistors in the Kirin 955. The increased number of transistors enhances its capabilities and overall performance. Like the Kirin 930, the Kirin 955 has a TDP rating of 5 Watts, showcasing its power efficiency in spite of its higher performance.
In conclusion, while both the Kirin 930 and Kirin 955 processors offer excellent performance, the Kirin 955 outshines its predecessor in terms of architectural improvements, smaller lithography, and a higher number of transistors. These advancements allow the Kirin 955 to deliver enhanced power and performance without compromising on power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on specific device requirements and user preferences.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | 2000 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-T880 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 64 |
DirectX | 11 | 11.2 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2016 April |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | Hi3655 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 850
2
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
3
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
5
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs MediaTek Helio P35
6
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
7
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Apple A13 Bionic
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs MediaTek Helio P60
9
Samsung Exynos 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
10
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G