HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the HiSilicon Kirin 935 are both processors designed by HiSilicon Technologies. While they have some similarities in architecture and core count, there are a few key differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features a total of eight cores. These cores are split into two types: four Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of 2 GHz and another four Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of 1.5 GHz. This processor is built on a 28 nm lithography process and has an instruction set of ARMv8-A. In terms of power consumption, it has a TDP of 5 Watts and contains approximately 1000 million transistors.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 also has eight cores. Similar to the Kirin 930, it consists of four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. However, the differentiating factor lies in the other four Cortex-A53 cores, which are clocked at a higher speed of 2.2 GHz. It also uses a 28 nm lithography process, has an instruction set of ARMv8-A, and contains around 1000 million transistors. In terms of power consumption, it has a slightly higher TDP of 7 Watts compared to the Kirin 930.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 generally offers a slight upgrade in CPU performance compared to the Kirin 930. The increased clock speed of its higher-performing cores may result in better overall performance, especially when it comes to tasks that require more processing power. However, it is worth noting that the Kirin 935 also has a higher power consumption, which may impact battery life to some extent. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features a total of eight cores. These cores are split into two types: four Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of 2 GHz and another four Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of 1.5 GHz. This processor is built on a 28 nm lithography process and has an instruction set of ARMv8-A. In terms of power consumption, it has a TDP of 5 Watts and contains approximately 1000 million transistors.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 also has eight cores. Similar to the Kirin 930, it consists of four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. However, the differentiating factor lies in the other four Cortex-A53 cores, which are clocked at a higher speed of 2.2 GHz. It also uses a 28 nm lithography process, has an instruction set of ARMv8-A, and contains around 1000 million transistors. In terms of power consumption, it has a slightly higher TDP of 7 Watts compared to the Kirin 930.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 generally offers a slight upgrade in CPU performance compared to the Kirin 930. The increased clock speed of its higher-performing cores may result in better overall performance, especially when it comes to tasks that require more processing power. However, it is worth noting that the Kirin 935 also has a higher power consumption, which may impact battery life to some extent. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Number of transistors | 1000 million | 1000 million |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-T628 MP4 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 4 |
| Shaders | 64 | 64 |
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 20MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2015 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | Hi3630 | Hi3635 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Xiaomi Xring O1
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
3
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Apple A12 Bionic
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Google Tensor G5
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
8
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
10
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Helio P35