HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the HiSilicon Kirin 935 are both processors designed by HiSilicon Technologies. While they have some similarities in architecture and core count, there are a few key differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features a total of eight cores. These cores are split into two types: four Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of 2 GHz and another four Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of 1.5 GHz. This processor is built on a 28 nm lithography process and has an instruction set of ARMv8-A. In terms of power consumption, it has a TDP of 5 Watts and contains approximately 1000 million transistors.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 also has eight cores. Similar to the Kirin 930, it consists of four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. However, the differentiating factor lies in the other four Cortex-A53 cores, which are clocked at a higher speed of 2.2 GHz. It also uses a 28 nm lithography process, has an instruction set of ARMv8-A, and contains around 1000 million transistors. In terms of power consumption, it has a slightly higher TDP of 7 Watts compared to the Kirin 930.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 generally offers a slight upgrade in CPU performance compared to the Kirin 930. The increased clock speed of its higher-performing cores may result in better overall performance, especially when it comes to tasks that require more processing power. However, it is worth noting that the Kirin 935 also has a higher power consumption, which may impact battery life to some extent. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features a total of eight cores. These cores are split into two types: four Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of 2 GHz and another four Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of 1.5 GHz. This processor is built on a 28 nm lithography process and has an instruction set of ARMv8-A. In terms of power consumption, it has a TDP of 5 Watts and contains approximately 1000 million transistors.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 also has eight cores. Similar to the Kirin 930, it consists of four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. However, the differentiating factor lies in the other four Cortex-A53 cores, which are clocked at a higher speed of 2.2 GHz. It also uses a 28 nm lithography process, has an instruction set of ARMv8-A, and contains around 1000 million transistors. In terms of power consumption, it has a slightly higher TDP of 7 Watts compared to the Kirin 930.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 generally offers a slight upgrade in CPU performance compared to the Kirin 930. The increased clock speed of its higher-performing cores may result in better overall performance, especially when it comes to tasks that require more processing power. However, it is worth noting that the Kirin 935 also has a higher power consumption, which may impact battery life to some extent. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | 1000 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-T628 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 64 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2560x1600 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2015 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | Hi3635 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio A25 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
5
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
6
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
7
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
8
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Helio G85