HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 and the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G are both powerful processors, but they have some distinct differences in their specifications.
Starting with the Kirin 930, it has an architecture consisting of 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor delivers efficient performance. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The Kirin 930 contains 1000 million transistors and has a TDP of 5 Watt, making it an energy-efficient option.
On the other hand, the Kirin 9000E 5G offers a more advanced architecture. It includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. These cores provide a balanced combination of power and efficiency. The processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and boasts a 5 nm lithography. With 15300 million transistors, the Kirin 9000E 5G is significantly more transistor-dense than the Kirin 930. Despite this, it has a slightly higher TDP of 6 Watt.
One notable feature of the Kirin 9000E 5G is its Neural Processing capabilities. It includes Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, as well as the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. These features enhance AI and machine learning capabilities, allowing for more efficient processing of data.
In summary, while the Kirin 930 is a capable processor, the Kirin 9000E 5G offers several advancements. It has a more powerful and efficient architecture, a smaller lithography, and a higher number of transistors. Additionally, the Kirin 9000E 5G incorporates advanced Neural Processing capabilities. These improvements make the Kirin 9000E 5G a more high-end and future-proof option compared to the Kirin 930.
Starting with the Kirin 930, it has an architecture consisting of 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor delivers efficient performance. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The Kirin 930 contains 1000 million transistors and has a TDP of 5 Watt, making it an energy-efficient option.
On the other hand, the Kirin 9000E 5G offers a more advanced architecture. It includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. These cores provide a balanced combination of power and efficiency. The processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and boasts a 5 nm lithography. With 15300 million transistors, the Kirin 9000E 5G is significantly more transistor-dense than the Kirin 930. Despite this, it has a slightly higher TDP of 6 Watt.
One notable feature of the Kirin 9000E 5G is its Neural Processing capabilities. It includes Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, as well as the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. These features enhance AI and machine learning capabilities, allowing for more efficient processing of data.
In summary, while the Kirin 930 is a capable processor, the Kirin 9000E 5G offers several advancements. It has a more powerful and efficient architecture, a smaller lithography, and a higher number of transistors. Additionally, the Kirin 9000E 5G incorporates advanced Neural Processing capabilities. These improvements make the Kirin 9000E 5G a more high-end and future-proof option compared to the Kirin 930.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | 1000 million | 15300 million |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Mali-G78 MP22 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 760 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 22 |
| Shaders | 64 | 352 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 3840x2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2020 October |
| Partnumber | Hi3630 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc SC9832E vs Samsung Exynos 990
2
Google Tensor G5 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9000S vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
6
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
7
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Helio G50
8
Unisoc T820 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
9
Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Apple M2 (iPad)