HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T710
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G and Unisoc Tiger T710 processors, several key specifications stand out.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features a more advanced configuration. It includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
In terms of the lithography process, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G employs a more advanced 5 nm process, while the Unisoc Tiger T710 uses the older 12 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more advanced and efficient the processor can be expected to be.
The number of cores is the same for both processors, with each having 8 cores. This allows for efficient multitasking and better overall performance.
Both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software.
One notable difference is in the neural processing capabilities. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, as well as HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, which enhance the processor's AI capabilities. In comparison, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has Dual NPU neural processing capabilities.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has a stated TDP value of 6 Watts, while the power consumption of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is not provided in the specifications.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G showcases more advanced specifications in terms of CPU architecture, lithography, and neural processing capabilities. However, it is important to consider factors such as power consumption and actual real-world performance when making a final decision.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features a more advanced configuration. It includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
In terms of the lithography process, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G employs a more advanced 5 nm process, while the Unisoc Tiger T710 uses the older 12 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more advanced and efficient the processor can be expected to be.
The number of cores is the same for both processors, with each having 8 cores. This allows for efficient multitasking and better overall performance.
Both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software.
One notable difference is in the neural processing capabilities. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, as well as HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, which enhance the processor's AI capabilities. In comparison, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has Dual NPU neural processing capabilities.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has a stated TDP value of 6 Watts, while the power consumption of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is not provided in the specifications.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G showcases more advanced specifications in terms of CPU architecture, lithography, and neural processing capabilities. However, it is important to consider factors such as power consumption and actual real-world performance when making a final decision.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | |
| Shaders | 352 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 |
| Partnumber | T710 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Apple A13 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
4
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 7420
8
MediaTek Helio A22 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020
9
MediaTek Helio P70 vs MediaTek Helio G70
10
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc T820