HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T710
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G and Unisoc Tiger T710 processors, several key specifications stand out.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features a more advanced configuration. It includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
In terms of the lithography process, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G employs a more advanced 5 nm process, while the Unisoc Tiger T710 uses the older 12 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more advanced and efficient the processor can be expected to be.
The number of cores is the same for both processors, with each having 8 cores. This allows for efficient multitasking and better overall performance.
Both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software.
One notable difference is in the neural processing capabilities. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, as well as HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, which enhance the processor's AI capabilities. In comparison, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has Dual NPU neural processing capabilities.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has a stated TDP value of 6 Watts, while the power consumption of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is not provided in the specifications.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G showcases more advanced specifications in terms of CPU architecture, lithography, and neural processing capabilities. However, it is important to consider factors such as power consumption and actual real-world performance when making a final decision.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features a more advanced configuration. It includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
In terms of the lithography process, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G employs a more advanced 5 nm process, while the Unisoc Tiger T710 uses the older 12 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more advanced and efficient the processor can be expected to be.
The number of cores is the same for both processors, with each having 8 cores. This allows for efficient multitasking and better overall performance.
Both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software.
One notable difference is in the neural processing capabilities. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, as well as HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, which enhance the processor's AI capabilities. In comparison, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has Dual NPU neural processing capabilities.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has a stated TDP value of 6 Watts, while the power consumption of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is not provided in the specifications.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G showcases more advanced specifications in terms of CPU architecture, lithography, and neural processing capabilities. However, it is important to consider factors such as power consumption and actual real-world performance when making a final decision.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 22 | |
Shaders | 352 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 |
Partnumber | T710 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Samsung Exynos 8895
2
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
3
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Samsung Exynos 980
6
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
7
Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9610
8
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
9
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs MediaTek Helio G85
10
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Helio G35