HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T612
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T612 processors, there are several notable differences in their specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features a more advanced architecture. It consists of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In contrast, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a higher clock speed and more Cortex-A77 cores, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G holds the advantage in terms of raw processing power.
Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications. However, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G is manufactured using a more advanced 5 nm lithography process, which results in improved power efficiency and potentially better performance.
Another key specification to consider is the thermal design power (TDP). The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has a TDP of 6 Watts, indicating lower power consumption and potentially less heat generated during operation. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a higher TDP of 10 Watts.
Additionally, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G boasts Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny neural processing units, as well as the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. These features are designed to enhance artificial intelligence capabilities and enable more efficient AI-based tasks.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and support the same instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G outshines the Unisoc Tiger T612 in several areas. It offers a more advanced architecture, higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography process, lower power consumption, and additional AI processing capabilities. These specifications suggest that the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G is likely to deliver superior performance and efficiency compared to the Unisoc Tiger T612.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features a more advanced architecture. It consists of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In contrast, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a higher clock speed and more Cortex-A77 cores, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G holds the advantage in terms of raw processing power.
Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications. However, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G is manufactured using a more advanced 5 nm lithography process, which results in improved power efficiency and potentially better performance.
Another key specification to consider is the thermal design power (TDP). The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has a TDP of 6 Watts, indicating lower power consumption and potentially less heat generated during operation. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a higher TDP of 10 Watts.
Additionally, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G boasts Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny neural processing units, as well as the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. These features are designed to enhance artificial intelligence capabilities and enable more efficient AI-based tasks.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and support the same instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G outshines the Unisoc Tiger T612 in several areas. It offers a more advanced architecture, higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography process, lower power consumption, and additional AI processing capabilities. These specifications suggest that the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G is likely to deliver superior performance and efficiency compared to the Unisoc Tiger T612.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 22 | 1 |
Shaders | 352 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 50MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2022 January |
Partnumber | T612 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 7870
2
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
3
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
4
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
5
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
6
Apple A10 Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
8
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020