HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G and Unisoc SC9863A are two processors that cater to different segments of the market. Let's compare their specifications to see how they differ.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G, it boasts an impressive architecture that includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of eight cores, it offers superior multitasking capabilities and efficient processing power. The Kirin 9000E 5G is built on a 5 nm lithography process, which results in higher performance and power efficiency. It packs an impressive 15300 million transistors, enabling it to handle demanding tasks seamlessly. Its TDP stands at 6 watts, indicating moderate power consumption. It also features advanced Neural Processing capabilities with Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A processor offers a more entry-level architecture. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of eight cores, it still offers decent processing power but may not be as powerful as the Kirin 9000E 5G. The SC9863A is built on a 28 nm lithography process, which is older and less power-efficient compared to the 5 nm process of the Kirin 9000E 5G. It has a TDP of 3 watts, meaning it consumes less power than the Kirin 9000E 5G. The SC9863A also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), although it doesn't provide details about its capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G is a flagship processor with a more advanced architecture, higher clock speeds, and superior power efficiency. It also offers advanced Neural Processing capabilities. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A is a more budget-oriented processor with a lower clock speed and an older lithography process. It still provides decent performance for entry-level devices but may not be as powerful or efficient as the Kirin 9000E 5G.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G, it boasts an impressive architecture that includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of eight cores, it offers superior multitasking capabilities and efficient processing power. The Kirin 9000E 5G is built on a 5 nm lithography process, which results in higher performance and power efficiency. It packs an impressive 15300 million transistors, enabling it to handle demanding tasks seamlessly. Its TDP stands at 6 watts, indicating moderate power consumption. It also features advanced Neural Processing capabilities with Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A processor offers a more entry-level architecture. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of eight cores, it still offers decent processing power but may not be as powerful as the Kirin 9000E 5G. The SC9863A is built on a 28 nm lithography process, which is older and less power-efficient compared to the 5 nm process of the Kirin 9000E 5G. It has a TDP of 3 watts, meaning it consumes less power than the Kirin 9000E 5G. The SC9863A also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), although it doesn't provide details about its capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G is a flagship processor with a more advanced architecture, higher clock speeds, and superior power efficiency. It also offers advanced Neural Processing capabilities. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A is a more budget-oriented processor with a lower clock speed and an older lithography process. It still provides decent performance for entry-level devices but may not be as powerful or efficient as the Kirin 9000E 5G.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 22 | 4 |
Shaders | 352 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2018 November |
Partnumber | SC9863A | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
3
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
4
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
6
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
8
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
9
Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
10
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1