HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 990
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 990. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2750 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G77 MP11 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | |
Execution units | 22 | 11 |
Shaders | 352 | 176 |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 Quarter 4 |
Partnumber | S5E9830 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2
MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs MediaTek Helio G50
3
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
6
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 vs MediaTek Helio G90
9
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus