HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 990
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 990. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G77 MP11 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | |
| Execution units | 22 | 11 |
| Shaders | 352 | 176 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | S5E9830 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Apple A12 Bionic
2
Samsung Exynos 1580 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
3
Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
6
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
8
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Apple A16 Bionic
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870