HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 9825. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 8500 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 12 |
| Shaders | 352 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.316 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | S5E9825 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Unisoc Tiger T616
3
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 7870
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
5
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Samsung Exynos 980
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
7
Apple A18 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
8
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
9
MediaTek Helio G50 vs Apple A15 Bionic
10
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460