HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9820
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 9820. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4 2x 2.31 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 12 |
| Shaders | 352 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.316 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2018 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | S5E9820 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
2
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Samsung Exynos 1330
3
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
4
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
5
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Apple A17 Pro
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
9
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Samsung Exynos 1580
10
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G