HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9820
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 9820. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4 2x 2.31 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 12 |
| Shaders | 352 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.316 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2018 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | S5E9820 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
2
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Apple M3 (iPad)
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Unisoc Tiger T615
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
8
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Apple A11 Bionic
10
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Helio G90T