HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9810
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 9810. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.9 GHz – Exynos M3 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 5300 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G72 MP18 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 570 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 18 |
| Shaders | 352 | 288 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400@90Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2018 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E9810 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Unisoc Tiger T615
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
7
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
10
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Apple A11 Bionic