HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9611
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 9611. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 3 |
| Shaders | 352 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | S5E9611 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs Apple M2 (iPad)
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
5
Google Tensor G3 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 vs MediaTek Helio G85
7
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
8
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
9
Apple A18 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100