HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 9609. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 3 |
| Shaders | 352 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | S5E9609 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
2
MediaTek MT6737 vs MediaTek Helio P90
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
4
Google Tensor G4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
5
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
6
Google Tensor G2 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
8
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
10
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Helio G90T