HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 2400. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4 5x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 10 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Xclipse 940 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | RDNA |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 6 |
| Shaders | 352 | 768 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 9.64 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 2.55 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2024 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E9945 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
2
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek MT6737
3
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
4
Google Tensor G5 vs Apple A12 Bionic
5
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Unisoc Tiger T615
8
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs MediaTek Helio P65
9
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
10
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek Helio G90