HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2100
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 2100. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1 3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 14 |
| Shaders | 352 | 224 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2020 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | S5E9840 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400
3
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Google Tensor G1
4
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
6
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
7
Apple A10 Fusion vs Unisoc Tiger T616
8
Unisoc T8300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400
9
MediaTek MT6739 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
10
MediaTek Helio G88 vs MediaTek Helio G80