HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 1330
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 1330. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 2 |
| Shaders | 352 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2960x1440@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2.55 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.28 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2023 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E8535 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
3
Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Unisoc SC9863A
5
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
7
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc Tiger T612
8
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Apple A17 Pro
9
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Apple A18 Pro