HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 1280
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Samsung Exynos 1280. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 4 |
| Shaders | 352 | 64 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2960x1440@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2.55 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.84 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2022 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E8825 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
6
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Unisoc SC9863A
10
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2