HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Prime) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Gold) 4x 1.80 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 585 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 698 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 670 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 2 |
| Shaders | 352 | 512 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 3 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2020 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | SM8250-AB | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
2
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs MediaTek Helio A25
3
Samsung Exynos 990 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Samsung Exynos 850
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs Google Tensor G1
6
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
7
Unisoc Tiger T620 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
9
MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
10
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 9609