HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.45 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 280 Gold) 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 280 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 682 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 540 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 500 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 740 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 2 |
| Shaders | 352 | 384 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 1 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2017 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | MSM8998, 8998, MSM8098, 8098 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 vs Google Tensor G5
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Apple A12 Bionic
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
6
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
7
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Apple A17 Pro
8
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Helio G81
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Google Tensor G2