HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.45 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 280 Gold) 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 280 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 682 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 540 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 500 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 740 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 2 |
| Shaders | 352 | 384 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 1 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2017 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | MSM8998, 8998, MSM8098, 8098 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs MediaTek Helio G70
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) vs Unisoc Tiger T618
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
4
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
5
Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Helio G99
6
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
10
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Apple A12 Bionic