HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.45 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 280 Gold) 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 280 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 682 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 540 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 500 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 740 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 2 |
| Shaders | 352 | 384 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 1 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2017 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | MSM8998, 8998, MSM8098, 8098 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple M3 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs MediaTek Helio A25
3
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs Samsung Exynos 850
5
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
7
Apple A9 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
8
Unisoc T820 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
9
Google Tensor G5 vs MediaTek Helio G85
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 1330