HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G

VS

Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Kirin 9000E 5G

737022

Snapdragon 768G

441857

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Kirin 9000E 5G

1059

Snapdragon 768G

704

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Kirin 9000E 5G

3702

Snapdragon 768G

1988

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55	1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Prime) 1x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Gold) 1x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 475 Silver)
Number of cores	8	8
Instruction Set	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Number of transistors	15300 million
TDP	6 Watt	5 Watt
Neural Processing	Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0	Qualcomm Hexagon 696

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 16 GB	up to 12 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4X
Memory frequency	2750 MHz	2133 MHz
Memory-bus	4x16 bit	2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 3.1

Graphics

GPU name	Mali-G78 MP22	Adreno 620
GPU Architecture	Valhall	Adreno 600
GPU frequency	760 MHz	750 MHz
Execution units	22	3
Shaders	352	192
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL API	2.1	2.0
OpenGL API	ES 3.2	ES 3.2
Vulkan API	1.2	1.1

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	3840x2160	2520x1080
Max camera resolution		1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
Max Video Capture	4K@60fps	4K@30fps
Video codec support	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	4.6 Gbps	3.7 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed	2.5 Gbps	1.6 Gbps
Wi-Fi	6 (802.11ax)	6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth	5.2	5.2
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS