HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 570 Gold) 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 570 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 694 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 2 |
| Shaders | 352 | 128 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 3.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2020 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | SM7225 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
2
MediaTek MT6737 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
3
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
6
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 850
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Apple A10X Fusion
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400