HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 636. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 260 Gold) 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 2000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 680 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 509 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 500 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 1 |
| Shaders | 352 | 128 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1200 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2017 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | SDM636 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
2
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Helio G90
4
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Apple A18 Pro
5
Apple M3 (iPad) vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs MediaTek Helio A25
7
Apple A9 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Unisoc Tiger T310