HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 460. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 240 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 240 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 11 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 3 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 683 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 2 |
| Shaders | 352 | 128 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.39 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2020 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | SM4250-AA | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Apple M2 (iPad)
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
3
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Samsung Exynos 1380
4
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
5
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
8
Unisoc Tiger T620 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
10
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 1280