HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

VS

Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 435. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Kirin 9000E 5G

737022

Snapdragon 435

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Kirin 9000E 5G

1059

Snapdragon 435

142

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Kirin 9000E 5G

3702

Snapdragon 435

620

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55	8x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53
Number of cores	8	8
Instruction Set	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A
Lithography	5 nm	28 nm
Number of transistors	15300 million	1000 million
TDP	6 Watt	4 Watt
Neural Processing	Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0	Qualcomm Hexagon 536

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 16 GB	up to 4 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR3
Memory frequency	2750 MHz	800 MHz
Memory-bus	4x16 bit	1x32 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 3.1

Graphics

GPU name	Mali-G78 MP22	Adreno 505
GPU Architecture	Mali Valhall	Qualcomm Adreno 500
GPU frequency	760 MHz	450 MHz
Execution units	22	1
Shaders	352	48
DirectX	12	11
OpenCL API	2.1	2.0
OpenGL API	ES 3.2
Vulkan API	1.2	1.0

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	3840x2160	1920x1200
Max camera resolution		1x 21MP
Max Video Capture	4K@60fps	FullHD+@30fps
Video codec support	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	4.6 Gbps	0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed	2.5 Gbps	0.1 Gbps
Wi-Fi	6 (802.11ax)	5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth	5.2	4.1
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS