HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 425. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 1000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 536 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 308 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 300 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 598 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 1 |
| Shaders | 352 | 24 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x800 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD+@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.08 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2016 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | MSM8917 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
2
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Google Tensor G5
3
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
4
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7100
7
Unisoc SC9863A vs Apple A9
8
Apple A18 vs Unisoc T9100
9
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Samsung Exynos 7870