HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T710 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G, it is equipped with a powerful set of CPU cores and architecture. It features 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it provides efficient multitasking and performance. The processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 5 nm. With 15300 million transistors, it ensures fast and smooth operations. The TDP for the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G is 6 Watts, making it energy-efficient. In terms of Neural Processing, it includes Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) for enhanced AI capabilities, utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has its own unique set of specifications. It includes 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores for a total of 8 cores. The processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. While it may not have the same clock speeds as the Kirin 9000 5G, it still provides decent processing power for various tasks. In terms of Neural Processing, it features Dual NPU, which enhances its AI capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T710 have distinct specifications. The Kirin 9000 5G offers higher clock speeds, a lower TDP, and advanced Neural Processing capabilities with its Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny. On the other hand, the Tiger T710 provides a more balanced set of specifications with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, along with its Dual NPU for AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G, it is equipped with a powerful set of CPU cores and architecture. It features 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it provides efficient multitasking and performance. The processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 5 nm. With 15300 million transistors, it ensures fast and smooth operations. The TDP for the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G is 6 Watts, making it energy-efficient. In terms of Neural Processing, it includes Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) for enhanced AI capabilities, utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has its own unique set of specifications. It includes 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores for a total of 8 cores. The processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. While it may not have the same clock speeds as the Kirin 9000 5G, it still provides decent processing power for various tasks. In terms of Neural Processing, it features Dual NPU, which enhances its AI capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T710 have distinct specifications. The Kirin 9000 5G offers higher clock speeds, a lower TDP, and advanced Neural Processing capabilities with its Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny. On the other hand, the Tiger T710 provides a more balanced set of specifications with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, along with its Dual NPU for AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | |
Shaders | 384 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 |
Partnumber | T710 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
2
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
4
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Apple A13 Bionic
5
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs MediaTek Helio A25
6
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
7
Google Tensor G1 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
8
Google Tensor G2 vs Unisoc SC9863A
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
10
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L