HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T700
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T700 processors, there are notable differences in their specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G features a more advanced architecture with a combination of Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55 cores. It has 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A5 cores. It has 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores.
In terms of the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores, which allows for efficient multitasking and improved performance. They both use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and technologies.
Another significant difference between these processors is their lithography. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G is manufactured using a more advanced 5 nm process, which results in lower power consumption and improved efficiency. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 is manufactured using a 12 nm process, which is less efficient in comparison.
The number of transistors is also worth noting. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G has 15300 million transistors, indicating a higher level of complexity and potentially better performance. Meanwhile, the Unisoc Tiger T700 does not provide specific information regarding the number of transistors.
When considering power consumption, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) is an important factor. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G has a TDP of 6 Watts, suggesting a relatively low power consumption. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G features neural processing capabilities with its Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny neural processing units. This enhances its ability to handle AI-related tasks. The Unisoc Tiger T700 does not have specific information regarding neural processing capabilities.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G stands out in terms of its advanced architecture, lower lithography, higher transistor count, and lower power consumption. However, it is essential to consider other factors such as pricing, real-world performance, and device compatibility when making a final comparison between these processors.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G features a more advanced architecture with a combination of Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55 cores. It has 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A5 cores. It has 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores.
In terms of the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores, which allows for efficient multitasking and improved performance. They both use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and technologies.
Another significant difference between these processors is their lithography. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G is manufactured using a more advanced 5 nm process, which results in lower power consumption and improved efficiency. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 is manufactured using a 12 nm process, which is less efficient in comparison.
The number of transistors is also worth noting. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G has 15300 million transistors, indicating a higher level of complexity and potentially better performance. Meanwhile, the Unisoc Tiger T700 does not provide specific information regarding the number of transistors.
When considering power consumption, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) is an important factor. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G has a TDP of 6 Watts, suggesting a relatively low power consumption. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G features neural processing capabilities with its Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny neural processing units. This enhances its ability to handle AI-related tasks. The Unisoc Tiger T700 does not have specific information regarding neural processing capabilities.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G stands out in terms of its advanced architecture, lower lithography, higher transistor count, and lower power consumption. However, it is essential to consider other factors such as pricing, real-world performance, and device compatibility when making a final comparison between these processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 2 |
Shaders | 384 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 March |
Partnumber | T700 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 990
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
4
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs MediaTek Helio G80
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
6
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
7
Unisoc SC9832E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Helio P70
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
10
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200