HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T700

VS
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T700 processors, there are notable differences in their specifications.

Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G features a more advanced architecture with a combination of Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55 cores. It has 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A5 cores. It has 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores.

In terms of the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores, which allows for efficient multitasking and improved performance. They both use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and technologies.

Another significant difference between these processors is their lithography. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G is manufactured using a more advanced 5 nm process, which results in lower power consumption and improved efficiency. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 is manufactured using a 12 nm process, which is less efficient in comparison.

The number of transistors is also worth noting. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G has 15300 million transistors, indicating a higher level of complexity and potentially better performance. Meanwhile, the Unisoc Tiger T700 does not provide specific information regarding the number of transistors.

When considering power consumption, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) is an important factor. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G has a TDP of 6 Watts, suggesting a relatively low power consumption. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.

Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G features neural processing capabilities with its Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny neural processing units. This enhances its ability to handle AI-related tasks. The Unisoc Tiger T700 does not have specific information regarding neural processing capabilities.

Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G stands out in terms of its advanced architecture, lower lithography, higher transistor count, and lower power consumption. However, it is essential to consider other factors such as pricing, real-world performance, and device compatibility when making a final comparison between these processors.

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5
Number of cores 8 8
Instruction Set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Number of transistors 15300 million
TDP 6 Watt 10 Watt
Neural Processing Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 16 GB up to 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 1866 MHz
Memory-bus 4x16 bit 2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Architecture Valhall Bifrost
GPU frequency 760 MHz 850 MHz
Execution units 24 2
Shaders 384 32
DirectX 12 11
OpenCL API 2.1 2.1
OpenGL API ES 3.2 ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.2 1.2

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 3840x2160 2400x1080
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP
Max Video Capture 4K@60fps FullHD@60fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP8
VP9
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 4.6 Gbps 0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 2.5 Gbps 0.1 Gbps
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
NavIC
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2020 October 2021 March
Partnumber T700
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Flagship Low-end

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Kirin 9000 5G
762886
Tiger T700
217829

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
Kirin 9000 5G
1062
Tiger T700
356

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
Kirin 9000 5G
3724
Tiger T700
1298