HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T618

VS

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T618 are two processors that cater to different market segments. Let's compare their specifications to see how they differ.

In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 9000 5G boasts a more advanced setup. It includes 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, along with 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 consists of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Kirin 9000 5G uses a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores, the Tiger T618 mainly focuses on power efficiency.

Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, there is a significant difference in their lithography. The Kirin 9000 5G utilizes a cutting-edge 5 nm lithography, which allows for better power efficiency and performance. The Tiger T618, on the other hand, employs a 12 nm lithography, which is a bit dated in comparison.

When it comes to neural processing capabilities, the Kirin 9000 5G stands out again. It features Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) for neural processing, along with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. The Tiger T618, on the other hand, employs an NPU or Neural Processing Unit. Although both processors offer neural processing capabilities, the Kirin 9000 5G's additional neural processing units and architecture make it more advanced in this regard.

Looking at power consumption, the Kirin 9000 5G has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, indicating its efficient power usage. The Tiger T618, however, has a higher TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the Kirin 9000 5G is more power-efficient than the Tiger T618.

In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T618 differ significantly in their specifications. The Kirin 9000 5G offers a more advanced architecture, superior lithography, additional neural processing units, and better power efficiency. The Tiger T618, on the other hand, focuses more on power efficiency but lacks some of the advanced features of the Kirin 9000 5G. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended application.

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Kirin 9000 5G

762886

Tiger T618

252037

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Kirin 9000 5G

1062

Tiger T618

398

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Kirin 9000 5G

3724

Tiger T618

1369

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55	2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55
Number of cores	8	8
Instruction Set	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A
Lithography	5 nm	12 nm
Number of transistors	15300 million
TDP	6 Watt	10 Watt
Neural Processing	Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0	NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 16 GB	up to 6 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4X
Memory frequency	2750 MHz	1866 MHz
Memory-bus	4x16 bit	2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 3.1

eMMC 5.1

Graphics

GPU name	Mali-G78 MP24	Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Architecture	Mali Valhall	Mali Bifrost
GPU frequency	760 MHz	850 MHz
Execution units	24	2
Shaders	384	32
DirectX	12	11
OpenCL API	2.1	2.1
OpenGL API	ES 3.2	ES 3.2
Vulkan API	1.2	1.2

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	3840x2160	2400x1080
Max camera resolution		1x 64M
Max Video Capture	4K@60fps	FullHD@60fps
Video codec support	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC)

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	4.6 Gbps	0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed	2.5 Gbps	0.1 Gbps
Wi-Fi	6 (802.11ax)	5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth	5.2	5.0
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS