HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
VS
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors that offer high-performance capabilities in the mobile device market.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G, it features a powerful CPU architecture with a three-tiered design. It consists of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture allows for efficient multitasking and smooth performance across various applications. Additionally, it utilizes the advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
The Kirin 9000 5G is manufactured using a cutting-edge 5 nm lithography process. This ensures high energy efficiency, leading to improved battery life in mobile devices. With a staggering 15,300 million transistors, this processor offers exceptional processing power for demanding tasks. Moreover, it has a relatively low thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts, contributing to its energy-saving capabilities.
In terms of neural processing, the Kirin 9000 5G incorporates the Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny technologies. These neural processing units (NPU) enhance artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities, enabling advanced features like facial recognition and AI photography. The processor also adopts the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, further optimizing AI performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G features a competitive set of specifications as well. Its CPU architecture consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While slightly lower in clock speed compared to the Kirin 9000 5G, it still provides solid performance for various tasks.
The Tanggula T770 5G adopts the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with the latest software. Manufactured with a 6 nm lithography process, this processor offers good energy efficiency. It has a TDP of 5 Watts, indicating a lower power consumption compared to the Kirin 9000 5G.
In terms of neural processing, the Tanggula T770 5G features an NPU for AI-related tasks. While not as advanced as the Kirin 9000 5G's Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny technologies, it still enables AI capabilities for enhanced user experiences.
In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G offer competitive specifications. The Kirin 9000 5G stands out with its powerful CPU architecture, advanced neural processing technologies, and a more advanced lithography process. However, the Tanggula T770 5G provides solid performance and energy efficiency at a slightly lower clock speed and lower TDP. The choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and the intended usage of the device in which they are being used.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G, it features a powerful CPU architecture with a three-tiered design. It consists of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture allows for efficient multitasking and smooth performance across various applications. Additionally, it utilizes the advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
The Kirin 9000 5G is manufactured using a cutting-edge 5 nm lithography process. This ensures high energy efficiency, leading to improved battery life in mobile devices. With a staggering 15,300 million transistors, this processor offers exceptional processing power for demanding tasks. Moreover, it has a relatively low thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts, contributing to its energy-saving capabilities.
In terms of neural processing, the Kirin 9000 5G incorporates the Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny technologies. These neural processing units (NPU) enhance artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities, enabling advanced features like facial recognition and AI photography. The processor also adopts the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, further optimizing AI performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G features a competitive set of specifications as well. Its CPU architecture consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While slightly lower in clock speed compared to the Kirin 9000 5G, it still provides solid performance for various tasks.
The Tanggula T770 5G adopts the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with the latest software. Manufactured with a 6 nm lithography process, this processor offers good energy efficiency. It has a TDP of 5 Watts, indicating a lower power consumption compared to the Kirin 9000 5G.
In terms of neural processing, the Tanggula T770 5G features an NPU for AI-related tasks. While not as advanced as the Kirin 9000 5G's Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny technologies, it still enables AI capabilities for enhanced user experiences.
In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G offer competitive specifications. The Kirin 9000 5G stands out with its powerful CPU architecture, advanced neural processing technologies, and a more advanced lithography process. However, the Tanggula T770 5G provides solid performance and energy efficiency at a slightly lower clock speed and lower TDP. The choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and the intended usage of the device in which they are being used.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 32 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 6 |
| Shaders | 384 | 96 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2160x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 February |
| Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio G35
3
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Apple A10 Fusion
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Samsung Exynos 990
6
MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek Helio P70
7
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Apple A14 Bionic