HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors that offer different specifications and features.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G, it is built on a 5 nm lithography, making it more advanced in terms of power efficiency and performance. It features a total of 8 CPU cores, with an architecture consisting of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55. This combination of cores allows for improved multitasking capabilities and faster processing speeds. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G also includes a neural processing unit (NPU) with Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x), along with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. These features enable enhanced AI capabilities, allowing for smoother and more intelligent user experiences.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G operates on a 12 nm lithography, which is slightly less advanced than the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G. It offers 8 CPU cores, utilizing a combination of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While this configuration still allows for effective multitasking and decent processing speeds, it may not be as powerful as the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G. However, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G does feature a dual NPU, which can enhance AI capabilities and contribute to improved performance in certain tasks.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G differ in terms of their lithography, CPU core configurations, and neural processing capabilities. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G offers a more advanced 5 nm lithography, a more powerful combination of CPU cores, and advanced NPU technology. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G operates on a 12 nm lithography, features a slightly less powerful CPU configuration, but offers a dual NPU for improved AI capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G, it is built on a 5 nm lithography, making it more advanced in terms of power efficiency and performance. It features a total of 8 CPU cores, with an architecture consisting of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55. This combination of cores allows for improved multitasking capabilities and faster processing speeds. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G also includes a neural processing unit (NPU) with Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x), along with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. These features enable enhanced AI capabilities, allowing for smoother and more intelligent user experiences.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G operates on a 12 nm lithography, which is slightly less advanced than the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G. It offers 8 CPU cores, utilizing a combination of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While this configuration still allows for effective multitasking and decent processing speeds, it may not be as powerful as the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G. However, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G does feature a dual NPU, which can enhance AI capabilities and contribute to improved performance in certain tasks.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G differ in terms of their lithography, CPU core configurations, and neural processing capabilities. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G offers a more advanced 5 nm lithography, a more powerful combination of CPU cores, and advanced NPU technology. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G operates on a 12 nm lithography, features a slightly less powerful CPU configuration, but offers a dual NPU for improved AI capabilities.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | |
Shaders | 384 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2960x1440@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | T740, Tiger T7510 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio P35
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
4
Apple A11 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2100
5
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
6
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
7
MediaTek Helio A25 vs MediaTek Helio P95
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
9
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
10
Apple A13 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G