HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and Unisoc SC9863A are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them based on their CPU cores and architecture, instruction set, lithography, TDP (Thermal Design Power), and neural processing capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G, it features a total of 8 CPU cores divided into three categories: 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55. The architecture utilized is ARMv8.2-A, and it employs a 5 nm lithography. With 15300 million transistors, this processor operates at a TDP of 6 Watts. In terms of neural processing, it incorporates Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x) with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A is equipped with a configuration of 8 CPU cores as well. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 9000 5G, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the lithography of this processor is 28 nm, which is notably higher than that of the Kirin 9000 5G. With a TDP of 3 Watts, it incorporates an NPU for neural processing.
In summary, while both processors possess 8 cores and follow the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, there are significant differences in their specifications. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G employs a more advanced 5 nm lithography, which may contribute to better power efficiency. Additionally, it incorporates Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny neural processors with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A operates on a 28 nm lithography and features an NPU for neural processing. These differences in specifications may result in variations in performance, power consumption, and overall efficiency.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G, it features a total of 8 CPU cores divided into three categories: 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55. The architecture utilized is ARMv8.2-A, and it employs a 5 nm lithography. With 15300 million transistors, this processor operates at a TDP of 6 Watts. In terms of neural processing, it incorporates Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x) with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A is equipped with a configuration of 8 CPU cores as well. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 9000 5G, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the lithography of this processor is 28 nm, which is notably higher than that of the Kirin 9000 5G. With a TDP of 3 Watts, it incorporates an NPU for neural processing.
In summary, while both processors possess 8 cores and follow the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, there are significant differences in their specifications. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G employs a more advanced 5 nm lithography, which may contribute to better power efficiency. Additionally, it incorporates Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny neural processors with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A operates on a 28 nm lithography and features an NPU for neural processing. These differences in specifications may result in variations in performance, power consumption, and overall efficiency.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 3 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 4 |
| Shaders | 384 | 128 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2160x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2018 November |
| Partnumber | SC9863A | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P22 vs MediaTek Helio G85
2
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
3
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 vs Samsung Exynos 850
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
7
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs MediaTek Helio P70
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2