HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Samsung Exynos 9825. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 8500 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 12 |
| Shaders | 384 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.316 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | S5E9825 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Unisoc T9100
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
3
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Helio P90
4
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Unisoc SC9832E
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
8
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Helio G85
9
MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
10
MediaTek Helio G91 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080