HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Samsung Exynos 9825. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | 8500 million |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 12 |
Shaders | 384 | 192 |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.316 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | S5E9825 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
3
Apple A11 Bionic vs Apple A17 Pro
4
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
5
Apple A10 Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 1330
6
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
8
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T616
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
10
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Unisoc Tiger T612