HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9611
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Samsung Exynos 9611. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 3 |
| Shaders | 384 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | S5E9611 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
6
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
7
Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
9
Apple A11 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
10
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F