HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Samsung Exynos 2400. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4 5x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 10 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Xclipse 940 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | RDNA |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 6 |
| Shaders | 384 | 768 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 9.64 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 2.55 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2024 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E9945 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
3
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
7
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9010
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200