HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Samsung Exynos 1380
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Samsung Exynos 1380. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 5 |
| Shaders | 384 | 80 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2960 x 1440 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 3.79 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.28 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2023 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E8835 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Google Tensor G4
2
Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
3
Apple A15 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
4
Google Tensor G5 vs Unisoc Tiger T620
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek MT6737
6
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
8
MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
9
Apple M1 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Helio P70